Paul Snively wrote:
>
> on 6/2/00 11:10 AM, Mark S. Miller at markm@caplet.com wrote:
>
> > In any case, the alternative I'm considering is just bash without make.
> > Given that incremental re-making isn't an issue, is there any reason to
> > prefer Ant to bash?
>
> My only reason is that I can run Ant on MacOS and not bash.
Ah yes - and on Windoze, too. And it knows about the different Java compilers...
Cheers,
Ben.
-- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html Coming to ApacheCon Europe 2000? http://apachecon.com/