[cap-talk] keeping discussion on cap-talk - network capabilities, etc.

[David Hopwood]

Jed Donnelley wrote:
> At 05:05 PM 10/26/2004, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Jed Donnelley wrote:
>>
>>> I think perhaps I should spend some time with the paper ref.
>>> you sent me that I hadn't seen before:
>>> http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-164R1.pdf
>>> and see if I can pick up enough of your terminology to make
>>> the discussions meaningful.  It's probably time to drop this
>>> discussion off the cap-talk list as I see others are not
>>> participating suggesting a polite lack of interest.
>>
>> PLEASE keep this discussion on cap-talk.

Ditto. BTW, is this a reasonable partial summary of the use of
capability designators:

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CapabilityDesignator

?

> I think a lot of what has come out of this latest round of
> discussions is clarification of terminology and separation
> of implementation levels.  I want to read the above paper
> (anybody else want to suggest any relevant to this
> terminology/level discussion while I'm at it?) and then
> back off a bit to perhaps write up some definitions of
> terms.  Perhaps there's something like that already
> available that I could just contribute to?

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CapabilitiesDictionary

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk>