[cap-talk] Firefox breaks the principle of identifiability

[Ian G]

Mark Miller wrote:

>
>> Secondly, petnames may "solve" the problem in theory, but are
>> not as well as logos.
>
>
> I have no problem with Pet Logos, so long as they follow the Pet Name 
> logic. (CapDesk uses Pet Icons in such a fashion in addition to Pet 
> Names.) In any case, could you explain a scenario where Pet Names are 
> insufficient?


Yes, if the user ignores words.  Or, are you saying that
using logos is a subset of petnames, in your lexicon?

iang

-- 
News and views on what matters in finance+crypto:
        http://financialcryptography.com/