[cap-talk] On the importance of being "untrusted"

[David Hopwood]

Tyler Close wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2005, at 1:13 PM, Jed at Webstart wrote:
> 
>> As with David Hopwood and as noted before, I prefer the notation 
>> "unnamed" to "untrusted".
> 
> I suspect that you and David want to use the term "unnamed" because you 
> want to name relationships, regardless of whether they are positive or 
> negative relationships.

No, I don't think that wholly negative relationships are worth naming.
Relationships that are a mixture of positive and negative are, however.

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk>