[cap-talk] Objects and Facets
clandau at macslab.com
Mon Aug 7 19:39:45 EDT 2006
At 4:18 PM -0700 8/7/06, Charles Landau wrote:
>I would be happy if someone can suggest a more intuitive word to
Here is a proposal.
Define "atomic object" to be what MarkM calls an object.
Define "object" to be an aggregate of one or more atomic objects -
what MarkM calls a composite.
An "object" is only well-defined if you specify the collection of
atomic objects that it comprises, which can be awkward to specify,
but often it is clear from context.
More information about the cap-talk