[cap-talk] Objects and Facets
erights at gmail.com
Mon Aug 7 20:14:43 EDT 2006
On 8/7/06, Charles Landau <clandau at macslab.com> wrote:
> Here is a proposal.
> Define "atomic object" to be what MarkM calls an object.
> Define "object" to be an aggregate of one or more atomic objects -
> what MarkM calls a composite.
> An "object" is only well-defined if you specify the collection of
> atomic objects that it comprises, which can be awkward to specify,
> but often it is clear from context.
I think that's workable, but I prefer David's "component".
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain
More information about the cap-talk