[cap-talk] Historical note (was: Boebert Farber paper reference?)

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 08:38 -0800, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> > Given your tale, I am prompted to wonder if you got the conclusion backwards?
> 
> Huh?

I found it hard to reconcile the statement that Paradigm responds to
objections on Myths with the statement that Paradigm is a prequel to
Myths. I do understand, and it isn't important. It was just a strange
bit of writing in your note.

shap