[cap-talk] On revocation and the use of wrappers and In Defenseof Identities

[Neal H. Walfield]

At Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:41:08 -0500,
Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> Brinkmann and Walfield's "Critique of the Hurd" complains that EROS
> imposes such a limit (He states it incorrectly at 4. The actual number
> is 20), but fails to contemplate the consequences of his preferred
> alternative (unstated, but presumed to be "no traversal limit").

I've read their critique too but I don't remember this point.  Which
section are you referring to?