[cap-talk] "Who" seen as thorny (was: Defense of Identities, etc.)

[Valerio Bellizzomi]

On 08/12/2006, at 19.11, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:

>On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 14:33 -0800, Jed at Webstart wrote:
>> At 10:01 AM 12/7/2006, Karp, Alan H wrote:
>> >Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>> >
(snip)

>Part of what I'm saying is that the term "subject" is different from the
>term "user" for a reason, and it often proves that when we are speaking
>of "who" what we really need is subject ids rather than user ids.

Could it be that subject ids are similar to identities and both are
different from user ids ?
If so, are subject ids really process ids ?


val