[cap-talk] Communicating conspirators (Re: Second ABAC Google talk is now up)

[Sandro Magi]

Eric Jacobs wrote:
> This was the only part of the presentation that I felt pretty
> dissatisfied with, and perhaps it has more to do with the treatment of
> the topic in the capability community in general than anything else, but
> I feel the arguments that were given were not convincing and did not
> resolve the question that was originally asked.
> 
> The original comment at 29:15 - (something like this, the audio is
> fuzzy)
> 
> "So, I just want to say here as well: I don't want Bob to have a
> reference to Carol except in the scope of the Foo operation. I
> don't want Bob to be able to save that (access?)..."

Doesn't a revocable forwarder address this question?

Sandro