[cap-talk] Communicating conspirators (Re: Second ABAC Google talk is now up)
John Carlson
john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net
Sun Jul 16 20:12:45 EDT 2006
Another experiment might be creating a virus that only
affects one computer. In the real world, could you create a virus
that only affects one person? What about twins?
I know that there are things that I do which I cannot get other
people to do.
Not through lack of trying to explain it, it's just an action that's
hard to explain.
Thus it seems intuitive to me that I could generate some information
that others wouldn't understand, no matter how hard I tried to explain
it. The question is, is there a way to send information that can't
be retransmitted in a similar fashion?
John
On Jul 16, 2006, at 4:40 PM, John Carlson wrote:
> It seems to me that communicating conspirators is kind of like this:
> "If I told you, I would have to kill you." I can see the case where
> you might tell one of the conspirators and lock them up in Pelican
> Bay until they die, but then why tell them at all? They would
> be of no use to you locked up.
>
> Does this make any sense to explain the communicating conspirators
> problem?
>
> I guess I am thinking of a case where I have insured that the object
> can only talk to me, that the implementation of the object is
> transparent,
> and I can see no way for the object to affect the state of an object
> besides me. Perhaps this is a stateless object with no information
> to transmit? Which makes the object useless? Would a mathematical
> function
> which only had parameters and no side effects qualify? I am talking
> about a function, not something implemented in the computer. This
> is pure thought, not something practical. Maybe security will change
> when we get quantum computers. We need to be prepared. Is there
> such a thing as private state that can only be shared with one
> particle/
> wave in physics? Entangled particles?
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> cap-talk at mail.eros-os.org
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
More information about the cap-talk
mailing list