[cap-talk] network level designation and authorization

[Sandro Magi]

coderman wrote:
>> With vpns, first you must allow multiple vpns to run simultaneously on
>> Bob's machine (which is a seriously hostile feature for vpns, you should
>> come up with a different name for whatever it is you are visualizing).
> 
> agreed, still trying to find a good name.  until then i'll temporarily
> call it a private virtual crossover (PVC)? to emphasize the direct
> peer to peer transport between IP endpoints rather than a VPN style
> perimeter defense.

So it's an encrypted link with a negotiable/arbitrary encryption
protocol. Didn't e-speak do exactly this? The direction coderman is
heading in sounds exactly like the descriptions of e-speak that I've
read on these lists.

Sandro