[cap-talk] choice of client-side for distributed application

[Ben Laurie]

On 6/9/06, John Carlson <john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> > On 6/8/06, John Carlson <john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If you want to stick with Java, you could make use of the underlying
> >>> libraries on which E is implemented: ELib. They're written in
> >>> Java and
> >>> might get you a long way towards your goal of a distributed
> >>> capability-based whiteboard system.
> >>
> >> I think I need to get a web host that allows shell access, so I can
> >> run an E server (or a waterken server).
> >
> > How about a CaPerl server?
> >
> > http://caperl.links.org/
>
> Hmm.  I read your slides.  How does CaPerl extend across the network?
> I'm not terribly worried about security on the server, I'm more
> concerned
> about making sure that people can't draw on the wrong whiteboard, or
> erase someone else's whiteboard.

That's up to you, though a planned extension is to provide a standard
service for mapping swiss numbers to caperl objects (which is pretty
much the only way to do this, unless you add the eSpeak variant of
linking the capability to the user).

>
>
> John
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> cap-talk at mail.eros-os.org
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
>