[cap-talk] Capability-based Projects - updated list
Jonathan S. Shapiro
shap at eros-os.com
Thu Aug 2 14:03:40 EDT 2007
Actually, I don't consider Mach a capability system either.
One issue is that the unit named by descriptors in both systems is the
server, not the object implemented by the server.
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:15 -0700, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote:
> > Spring is not a capability system.
>
> Since the Spring folk seem to claim it is, it would be good to clarify
> the matter. Could you elaborate? Thanks.
>
More information about the cap-talk
mailing list