[cap-talk] Capability-based Projects - updated list

Jonathan S. Shapiro shap at eros-os.com
Thu Aug 2 14:03:40 EDT 2007


Actually, I don't consider Mach a capability system either.

One issue is that the unit named by descriptors in both systems is the
server, not the object implemented by the server.

On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 10:15 -0700, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 8/2/07, Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap at eros-os.com> wrote:
> > Spring is not a capability system.
> 
> Since the Spring folk seem to claim it is, it would be good to clarify
> the matter. Could you elaborate? Thanks.
> 



More information about the cap-talk mailing list