[cap-talk] "Same" key

[Mark S. Miller]

Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> The problem in this conversation is that we are failing to distinguish
> correctly between the capability itself and the object that it
> designates. The EQ relationship is a relationship on capabilities, not
> objects. In real implementations, two distinct capabilities (i.e.
> capabilities that are not EQ) may designate the same object because of
> the way the object server is implemented.

Can you give an example where two not-EQ caps designate the same object?

-- 
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

     Cheers,
     --MarkM