[cap-talk] "Same" key
david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk
Tue Feb 6 20:30:19 CST 2007
Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Bill Frantz wrote:
>>Are the following equivalencies substantially correct?
>>What the OS view calls an "Object", the language view calls a
>>What the OS view calls a "Facet", the language view calls an "Object".
>>The OS view does not use the term "Composite".
>>The language view uses the term "Facet" to mean a reference to an object
>>which is part of a composite.
Where is this "OS view" terminology coming from? I don't recognize it from
the documentation associated with any particular capability OS.
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk>
More information about the cap-talk