[cap-talk] "Same" key

[David Hopwood]

Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Bill Frantz wrote:
> 
>>Are the following equivalencies substantially correct?
>>
>>What the OS view calls an "Object", the language view calls a
>>"Composite".
>>
>>What the OS view calls a "Facet", the language view calls an "Object".
>>
>>The OS view does not use the term "Composite".
>>
>>The language view uses the term "Facet" to mean a reference to an object
>>which is part of a composite.
> 
> Yes.

Where is this "OS view" terminology coming from? I don't recognize it from
the documentation associated with any particular capability OS.

-- 
David Hopwood <david.nospam.hopwood at blueyonder.co.uk>