[cap-talk] "Composite", was "Same" key
Charles Landau
clandau at macslab.com
Wed Feb 14 22:34:51 CST 2007
At 1:15 AM +0000 2/15/07, David Hopwood wrote:
>I wrote:
> > Charles Landau wrote:
> >> 1 >1 >=1
>>>1 (MarkM) Object Composite ?
>>
> > The "?" is "Composite".
I couldn't find a formal definition of "composite" in MarkM's thesis,
so perhaps he can clarify. But it seems to defy common English to say
a single atomic object is also a "composite".
> >>3 (Landau) Atomic object Composite object Object
>
>An abstraction with two objects such that one is an interface subset
>of the other, is an instance of the ">1" column.
Yes.
>I thought that part of
>your argument was that you didn't want to call that "composite", since
>it is not constructed by composition, narrowly defined.
No. This example is clearly a composite.
More information about the cap-talk
mailing list