[cap-talk] "Composite", was "Same" key
James A. Donald
jamesd at echeque.com
Thu Feb 15 21:18:28 CST 2007
David Hopwood wrote:
> Nothing else in section 6.2 contradicts a single
> object being a special case of a composite.
That is silly.
> More to the point, it is useful to view it as such,
> because clients of a composite cannot necessarily tell
> whether it is made up of more than one object.
No. It is often useful to view a composite as an atomic
object. It is never useful to view an atomic object as
More information about the cap-talk