[cap-talk] Object-capabilities and existing systems (was Re: Horton at HotSec '07: How broadly object/capability?)
Pierre THIERRY
nowhere.man at levallois.eu.org
Mon Jul 9 06:42:42 EDT 2007
Scribit Ivan Krstić dies 09/07/2007 hora 04:52:
> Similarly, as a developer, I'm not going to target an OS based on
> security features, and as a user, I won't pick and use one based on
> them. The bottom line then comes down to integrating capabilities
> with existing approaches
In this respect, what is the difference between BitFrost and a POSIX
emulation in object-capability OS?
Curiously,
Pierre
--
nowhere.man at levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/cap-talk/attachments/20070709/adb27e7b/attachment.bin
More information about the cap-talk
mailing list