[cap-talk] Horton at HotSec '07: How broadly object/capability?

[Jed Donnelley]

At 08:45 AM 7/9/2007, Karp, Alan H wrote:
>Jed wrote:
> >
> > That's where I believe the more general arguments
> > that I noted in my previous message are applicable
> > and, I believe, should be added to the paper in
> > place of removed implementation details (as possible).
>
>I have no objection as long as readers still consider the paper to be
>about Horton and not just a tract about capabilities. A 50/50 split
>works for me.

Perfect.  If MarkM agrees then I believe we're close to
a point where we have a plan for working on the revision
of the paper with a focus on the HotSec presentation and
discussion.

--Jed  http://www.webstart.com/jed-signature.html