[cap-talk] Why is EQ so dang fascinating?
jed at nersc.gov
Mon Nov 5 14:34:07 EST 2007
On 11/5/2007 11:09 AM, Charles Landau wrote:
> With EQ, the bank wouldn't need to invoke a malicious purse, and I
> would always know any slow response would be the fault of the bank.
Doesn't MyCap suffice for the above? That is, isn't the purse
a capability supported by the bank? If you are going to try to
arrange to be able to only blame the bank (or whatever single
service), then it seems that all related capability invocations
must be internal to that one service - hence subject to MyCap
rather than the more general EQ. Right?
More information about the cap-talk