[cap-talk] sending anyone in the world a capability

John Carlson john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Oct 17 22:15:48 EDT 2007


Should we provide an interface such that anyone in the world can be  
sent capability,
and that capability has just enough description (or perhaps just  
allows the receiver to
send messages back to the sender) such that the person will know if  
it's a good idea
to invoke operations on the capability?  I know YURLs and Email or  
XMPP provide
good solutions.  Perhaps I am looking for a service which can take a  
partial YURL and it
will describe what the capability is before the user invokes it.  Like

https://describeyurl.org/describeurl?yurl=https://coderextreme.net/ 
dbyurl#8abc3484883def
<plus another private piece of the yurl which isn't sent to  
describeyurl.org>

People could gain confidence that describeyurl.org would provide  
accurate explanations.

What I am thinking is that the YURL sent to describeyurl.org would  
not be the entire capability,
and therefore, the capability wouldn't be leaked.   There would be a  
public and private
part to the YURL.  The public part would be sent to describeyurl.org  
and both the public
and private parts would be sent to coderextreme.net when the  
capability is invoked.

Is anyone doing something like this?  Is this OAuth in another form?

The user interface might be a link with a tool tip which is retrieved  
from describeyurl.org

Is this a centralized petname service?  I am also thinking that the  
description could
contain method names for the user to choose from.

Probably I am just rehashing old ideas.  Perhaps providing a safe web  
browser would
be sufficient to fix these problems.  I am thinking about using man- 
in-the-middle
for the good of the planet.

John


More information about the cap-talk mailing list