[cap-talk] do caps-in-URLs work in practice? (was: Disabling clipboard access in Internet Explorer)
Mike Samuel
mikesamuel at gmail.com
Wed Dec 3 16:12:05 CST 2008
Could you use <link rel="alternate" media="print"
href="./printable_version"> to downgrade the capability that shows up on the
printed page, or launder it entirely by using a generic URL that displays
printable content based on a webkey in the referrer?
2008/12/3 Bill Frantz <frantz at pwpconsult.com>
> alan.karp at hp.com (Karp, Alan H) on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 wrote:
>
> >Zooko wrote:
> >>
> >> Too bad! Tahoe's caps are too long to print in a footer.
> >>
> >Which provides the desired security.
>
> However, from RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1):
>
> Note: Servers ought to be cautious about depending on URI lengths
> above 255 bytes, because some older client or proxy
> implementations might not properly support these lengths.
>
> Cheers - Bill
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Frantz | I like the farmers' market | Periwinkle
> (408)356-8506 | because I can get fruits and | 16345 Englewood Ave
> www.pwpconsult.com | vegetables without stickers. | Los Gatos, CA 95032
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> cap-talk at mail.eros-os.org
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/cap-talk/attachments/20081203/d448ec41/attachment.html
More information about the cap-talk
mailing list