[cap-talk] P-1935 - on old truth and loss of control

[Jonathan S. Shapiro]

On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 18:24 -0800, Jed Donnelley wrote:
> What I was referring to was the fact that the authors did
> a huge amount of "research" (reading other papers, surveying
> the field, etc.).  It was only 'scholarly' in that sense.
> You would know better than I about a more precise definition
> of "scholarly" in scholarly circles Jonathan.

This is generally insufficient to be considered scholarly. A review
process is required as well, in order to validate the work. This paper
didn't get any suhc review.

shap