[cap-talk] Confused Deputies arising from object capabilities

Jed Donnelley jed at nersc.gov
Mon Feb 4 17:07:27 EST 2008


On 2/4/2008 10:26 AM, Karp, Alan H wrote:
> Jed wrote:
>> Whew.  That would be pretty darn ACL of you Alan!  Still, I
>> also believe that it could be done safely - though it seems to
>> me to require considerable additional careful thought.  For
>> example, I don't know how the Horton tunnel would make the
>> identity information available to Bob.  Still, I suppose the
>> above is possible.  Wouldn't be my first choice for an
>> architecture ;-)

> Bob has a single capability for writing the log.  That
> capability points to a caretaker.  Horton sets the
> redirect in the caretaker to write to the appropriate file. 
> Bob never needs to know the identity of the requester.

I see.  A somewhat similar issue shows up in the
proposed MLS over Horton scheme that I blue sky.
I imagine you will notice it if you follow it
through.

--Jed  http://www.webstart.com/jed/



More information about the cap-talk mailing list