[cap-talk] [cap-conf] OS juncture papers

[Valerio Bellizzomi]

On 29/02/2008, at 9.56, Jed Donnelley wrote:

>At 04:28 AM 2/29/2008, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
>>On 28/02/2008, at 18.07, Jed Donnelley wrote:
>>
>> >On 2/28/2008 4:15 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
>> >> This list makes you cross-post and us have duplicate messages. Does
it
>> >> make sense for a single workshop ?
>> >
>> >Hmmm.  There has already been some and I expect more
>> >traffic on cap-conf that will be more or less logistical
>> >for the workshop.  I don't think people on cap-talk
>> >would be interested (?).  I know that much of what
>> >is discussed on cap-talk is not of interest to some
>> >of the historical or logistical people interested
>> >in the cap-conf list.
>> >
>> >Still, there are items that seem to have both
>> >historical interest and it seems to me of interest
>> >to cap-talk - as was the case with this "OS juncture"
>> >message.
>> >
>> >I suggest leaving things as they are for at least
>> >a while.  If this continues to be a concern then
>> >we can reevaluate it.
>>
>>But I hope that this list will lead to *many* cap workshops, possibly
also
>>one that I can attend without traveling outside the country.
>>
>>val
>
>Hmmm.  Doesn't the above topic seem more relevant to the
>cap-talk list than to the cap-conf list?  I'm responding
>on cap-talk.
>
>The above seems to present quite a rosy picture.  When you
>say "without traveling outside the country", is the
>country you refer to Italy?

Not specifically.

>  How much 'capability' activity
>is there in Italy?

A few, capabilities have been mentioned in a TCP/IP course at work.

val