[cap-talk] How desirable / feasible is a persistent OCAP language?

[Ivan Krstić]

On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:54 PM, Mike Samuel wrote:
> You're not going to sell something as enterprise software unless  
> it's inscrutable enough to require its own certification process.

Interestingly, at least in the message bus space, the enterprise  
players are lining up behind AMQP (<http://amqp.org>), which appears  
to be a rather reasonable design.

--
Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | http://radian.org