[cap-talk] How desirable / feasible is a persistent OCAP language?
krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu
Fri Jul 18 08:02:46 CDT 2008
On Jul 17, 2008, at 7:54 PM, Mike Samuel wrote:
> You're not going to sell something as enterprise software unless
> it's inscrutable enough to require its own certification process.
Interestingly, at least in the message bus space, the enterprise
players are lining up behind AMQP (<http://amqp.org>), which appears
to be a rather reasonable design.
Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | http://radian.org
More information about the cap-talk