[cap-talk] How desirable / feasible is a persistent OCAP language?
Jonathan S. Shapiro
shap at eros-os.com
Thu Jul 24 21:41:51 CDT 2008
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 08:34 +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> Neither the registry nor etc/config have provision to
> maintain, or even define, internal consistency.
I agree with this statement. That said, the registry is better
than /etc/config (/etc/sysconfig?), because:
1. It has a well-defined name space.
2. It has a schema for well-formedness. That is not the same
as consistency, but it is a step in the right direction.
I take it that what you want is some form of schema-like specification?
More information about the cap-talk