[cap-talk] How desirable / feasible is a persistent OCAP language?

Mark Miller erights at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 03:39:29 CDT 2008


On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Bill Frantz <frantz at pwpconsult.com> wrote:

>
> Alan Karp was discussing last Friday the point that the most
> important thing that needs to be persisted in a capability system
> is changes in the long-term capability relationships, and that
> these changes can conceptionally be persisted by rewriting the ACLs
> for the capabilities active entities receive when they authenticate
> themselves to the system.
>

Except that the holder of a cap to resource R generally doesn't have
permission to add itself to R's ACL.


-- 
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

Cheers,
--MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/cap-talk/attachments/20080728/6bda698c/attachment.html 


More information about the cap-talk mailing list