[cap-talk] Domain change (IPC?) overhead

[Pierre THIERRY]

Scribit David Wagner dies 25/03/2008 hora 13:49:
> My impression is that type qualifiers are most useful when the concept
> expressed by the qualifier is orthogonal to the concept expressed by
> the type (e.g., it makes sense to have both a DeepCopy T and a
> non-DeepCopy T, and the implementation of a T should not have to be
> aware of the DeepCopy status).

I don't know if it's relevant to the current discussion, but I don't
think that shallow vs. deep copy are independant of the object. The
semantics of the object's fields determinate how a deep copy should be
made.

Quickly,
Pierre
-- 
nowhere.man at levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/cap-talk/attachments/20080325/0d7609ef/attachment.bin