[cap-talk] Domain change (IPC?) overhead

[David-Sarah Hopwood]

Kevin Reid wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 17:13, David-Sarah Hopwood wrote:
> 
>> If, for the sake of argument, a system were designed to provide space
>> accounting at vat granularity but was otherwise identical in semantics
>> to E, would that system "scale up successfully", in your opinion?
> 
> E is not intended to prohibit space accounting at vat granularity; it  
> is even desirable for implementations to do so.

I will rephrase: suppose that a system were to *require* space accounting
at vat granularity, but was otherwise identical in semantics to E, would
that system "scale up successfully", in Jonathan's opinion?

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood