[cap-talk] capability-enabled spatial databases
kpreid at mac.com
Tue Apr 21 12:22:30 EDT 2009
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:41, John Carlson wrote:
> Would a typical spatial extension of SQL w/ SSL/TLS/PKI qualify to
> be a capability protocol, if it used swiss numbers for point,
> polygon, object, collection and class information and you couldn't
> manipulate the database (CRUD) without using a swiss number
> (specifying a single thing)?
Would whoever it was from 2009-04-17's friam discussion that said that
capabilites and (relational?) databases have useful but irreconcilable
properties please expand upon it in this context?
Kevin Reid <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>
More information about the cap-talk