[cap-talk] capability-enabled spatial databases

[Kevin Reid]

On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:41, John Carlson wrote:

> Would a typical spatial extension of SQL w/ SSL/TLS/PKI qualify to  
> be a capability protocol, if it used swiss numbers for point,  
> polygon, object, collection and class information and you couldn't  
> manipulate the database (CRUD) without using a swiss number  
> (specifying a single thing)?

Would whoever it was from 2009-04-17's friam discussion that said that  
capabilites and (relational?) databases have useful but irreconcilable  
properties please expand upon it in this context?

-- 
Kevin Reid                            <http://homepage.mac.com/kpreid/>