[cap-talk] "ACLs don't" paper rejected from Oakland 09

[Ben Laurie]

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ben Laurie <benl at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:04 PM, David Wagner <daw at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>> I wouldn't feel too demoralized.  I'd view these reviews as mildly
>> encouraging.  Several of the reviewers seemed fairly receptive to the
>> points you are making.  I'd treat these reviews as an encouragement to
>> revise and resubmit (probably to a conference one step down from Oakland)
>> -- say, to SACMAT, or HotSec, or New Security Paradigms, or maybe ACISP
>> or SECURECOMM.  New Security Paradigms is looking for papers on new
>> security paradigms, right?
>
> And also considers itself to be a venue for improving how you get your
> point across - it is expected that you revise your paper after the
> meeting...
>
> And it is a fun workshop.
>
> Plus I am on the PC this year :-)

Alternatively, use the New Peer Reviewed Journal - i.e. the
blogosphere. It is far more widely read than the proceedings of any
conference.