[cap-talk] Petnames versus E-order with ocaps

[Sandro Magi]

David Wagner wrote:
> That sounds on the surface like it may have lousy usability properties.
> Or perhaps what I mean to say is this.  Petnames exist for the purpose of
> helping humans to use the system safely, so any consideration of whether
> these two differences should have the same petname or not ought to take
> into account human factors.

The human factors don't sound bad from the discussion so far. The new
reference is basically "unresolved" until the handshake completes, after
which it resolves to a known petname.

Sandro