[cap-talk] Petnames versus E-order with ocaps

Bill Frantz frantz at pwpconsult.com
Sat Jan 31 01:14:00 EST 2009

david.hopwood at industrial-designers.co.uk (David-Sarah Hopwood) on Saturday, January 31, 2009 wrote:

>The advantage of this approach relative to WormholeOp is that it can
>be layered on top of a secure channel protocol such as TLS, without
>having a higher layer perform additional crypto operations based on
>keys established for the secure channel, which could be considered a
>layering violation.

One of the areas of active discussion on the TLS list is providing keying
material from the TLS agreement for application-level code. There seem to
be other needs for this facility.

Cheers - Bill

Bill Frantz        | When it comes to the world     | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | around us, is there any choice | 16345 Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | but to explore? - Lisa Randall | Los Gatos, CA 95032

More information about the cap-talk mailing list