[cap-talk] "ACLs don't" paper rejected from Oakland 09

[Mark Miller]

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Steve Witham <sw at tiac.net> wrote:

> "Gotos considered harmful."  But a Gotos only comes around once in a
> great while.  You would have to be already well-respected & write a
> good screed.  Btw, Google only returns one hit for "ACLs considered
> harmful" http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~410/lectures/L32_Protection.pdf<http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7E410/lectures/L32_Protection.pdf>
> and it's a page (about EROS) that's been taken down (but in Google's
> cache at the moment).
>

Redoing that Google search and clicking on the link in:

*In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some
entries very similar to the 1 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results
included<http://www.google.com/search?q=%22ACLs+considered+harmful%22&hl=en&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS273US273&filter=0>
.*

reveals

  http://www.acm.jhu.edu/~nwf/cs438/lectures/L32_Protection.odp

which is an openoffice version that's still available.

-- 
Text by me above is hereby placed in the public domain

   Cheers,
   --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/cap-talk/attachments/20090131/4d41c7ac/attachment.html