[cap-talk] "ACLs don't" paper rejected from Oakland 09
benl at google.com
Sat Jan 31 23:58:49 EST 2009
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:04 PM, David Wagner <daw at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I wouldn't feel too demoralized. I'd view these reviews as mildly
> encouraging. Several of the reviewers seemed fairly receptive to the
> points you are making. I'd treat these reviews as an encouragement to
> revise and resubmit (probably to a conference one step down from Oakland)
> -- say, to SACMAT, or HotSec, or New Security Paradigms, or maybe ACISP
> or SECURECOMM. New Security Paradigms is looking for papers on new
> security paradigms, right?
And also considers itself to be a venue for improving how you get your
point across - it is expected that you revise your paper after the
And it is a fun workshop.
Plus I am on the PC this year :-)
More information about the cap-talk