[cap-talk] Collaboration opportunity
benl at google.com
Fri Jun 10 12:10:06 PDT 2011
On 10 June 2011 19:41, David Barbour <dmbarbour at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:33 AM, John Carlson <john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net
> > wrote:
>> Might be interesting if your initial set of capabilities
> granted on login were based on a role.
> I envision a 'role' being modeled as a registry of capabilities and
> meta-data. Registries can be connected in various ways, and provide
> revocable membranes. A specific user would also be modeled as a registry
> that some administrator has granted some revocable roles.
> I would like to be rid of the notion of 'login', at least on any
> per-administration basis.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. But in any case, there must surely be a
moment at which I prove to my device that I am me and not some imposter, at
which point my big bag o' capabilities becomes available to me?
Is this not 'login'?
> cap-talk mailing list
> cap-talk at mail.eros-os.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cap-talk