[cap-talk] Collaboration opportunity

[Ben Laurie]

On 10 June 2011 19:41, David Barbour <dmbarbour at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:33 AM, John Carlson <john.carlson3 at sbcglobal.net
> > wrote:
>
>> Might be interesting if your initial set of capabilities
>>
> granted on login were based on a role.
>>
>
> I envision a 'role' being modeled as a registry of capabilities and
> meta-data. Registries can be connected in various ways, and provide
> revocable membranes. A specific user would also be modeled as a registry
> that some administrator has granted some revocable roles.
>
> I would like to be rid of the notion of 'login', at least on any
> per-administration basis.
>

I'm not sure what you mean by this. But in any case, there must surely be a
moment at which I prove to my device that I am me and not some imposter, at
which point my big bag o' capabilities becomes available to me?

Is this not 'login'?


>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cap-talk mailing list
> cap-talk at mail.eros-os.org
> http://www.eros-os.org/mailman/listinfo/cap-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.eros-os.org/pipermail/cap-talk/attachments/20110610/c624b3e3/attachment.html