[e-cvs] cvs commit: e/doc/talks/pisa/paper index.html

markm@eros.cs.jhu.edu markm@eros.cs.jhu.edu
Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:37:10 -0500


markm       01/12/28 10:37:10

  Modified:    doc/talks/pisa/paper index.html
  Log:
  more

Revision  Changes    Path
1.14      +4 -4      e/doc/talks/pisa/paper/index.html

Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/e/doc/talks/pisa/paper/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.13 -r1.14
--- index.html	2001/12/28 15:06:49	1.13
+++ index.html	2001/12/28 15:37:10	1.14
@@ -120,9 +120,9 @@
       <p>Why are some societies so much better able to generate wealth than others? 
         During the great oppressions of the twentieth century, many people, including 
         the authors this paper, held the naive view that once oppression was out 
-        of the way, market would bloom and take care of the people. This has proven 
-        tragically wrong. The years since then have shown that the absence of 
-        oppression was not enough. Free speech was not enough. The end of socialism 
+        of the way, markets would bloom and take care of the people. This has 
+        proven tragically wrong. The years since then have shown that the absence 
+        of oppression was not enough. Free speech was not enough. The end of socialism 
         was not enough. The universal desire for capitalism was not enough. In 
         order to successfully help, we must first solve this riddle. Many people 
         have tried, and the answers proposed by Hernando de Soto and Francis Fukuyama 
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
         Roger Ebert, notaries, arbiters, courts and cops, money, etc... The list 
         is endless. </p>
       <p><img src="images/2-low-trust.gif" width="350" height="218" align="right">From 
-        a simple graph-theoretic point of view [<a href="#Granovetter73">Granovetter73</a>], 
+        a simple graph-theoretic point of view (inspired by [<a href="#Granovetter73">Granovetter73</a>]), 
         we can analyze the Fukiyama low-trust world (in which the fanout from 
         each node is small) and the de Soto missing-WTII world (in which the hubs 
         are absent), and immediately recognize which effect has the greater impact