Oops. Distributed Confinement requires Discretion
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 13:20:05 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> Fortunately, the patent is invalid anyway.
Why? And in what jurisdiction? Presumably you mean the US.
> And even if it weren't, the
> worst case is that E would have to live with only single-machine
> confinement until 2003. Not a big deal, but it would be a shame.
I'm intrigued. What's E?
<firstname.lastname@example.org> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/>
"Why are you withholding me?" -- name withheld "Oh... And dig this: I
am a fish. 'Nuff said." -- Joe Blaylock (no further explanation)
These are the denizens of the CLUG mailing list. Their five-year mission: