Oops. Distributed Confinement requires Discretion
Mark S. Miller
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 10:42:36 -0800
Gotta run to catch a plane, so I'll be brief
At 10:20 AM 12/18/98 , Kragen Sitaker wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Mark S. Miller wrote:
>> Fortunately, the patent is invalid anyway.
>Why? And in what jurisdiction? Presumably you mean the US.
>> And even if it weren't, the
>> worst case is that E would have to live with only single-machine
>> confinement until 2003. Not a big deal, but it would be a shame.
>I'm intrigued. What's E?
See http://www.erights.org , especially