The Declaration Approach (was: Some thoughts on the 'reveal' operator)
Douglas Crockford
crock@communities.com
Thu, 21 Oct 1999 12:25:34 -0700
> >The more I hear, the more I like:
> >
> > def square(x) reveals {x*x}
> >
> >(Or perhaps)
> >
> > to square(x) reveal {x*x}
>
> Ok, it's still in the running. In fact, at the moment, it's the only
concrete proposal left in the running. However, you bring up an interesting
problem above. E has both methods and functions. I *really* don't want to
introduce both "reveal" and "reveals". Depending on which way we go, we'd
be stuck having to live with one of
>
> def square(x) reveal {x*x}
> or
> to square(x) reveals {x*x}
Perhaps the answer is provided by harnessing the power of our friend, The
Gerund:
def square(x) revealing {x*x}
and
to square(x) revealing {x*x}