gnu.bytecode & gnu.expr License
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 14:17:05 -0700
> At 10:59 AM 10/23/99 , Paul Snively wrote:
> >>E is currently under the Mozilla license and the
> >>maintainers are adamant about not changing that.
> It isn't that we're adamant, it's that we have no choice. Communities.com,
> where E was originally developed, and where I worked on it (back when it
> was Electric Communities), own the copyright. The open sourced it under
> Mozilla & I left to continue working on it with their blessings.
I have to apologize for the poor choice of words on my part: obviously
there's a great deal of history here that I was not involved in.
> I must moderate Paul's enthusiasm here. "very safe bet" goes way too far.
> At such a time as we have an apparently working draft release of E with a
> compiler built on these packages, and generating code that we're happy
> with, then it's a safe bet. Until then, I always expect rude surprises.
> After all, you obviously didn't write these packages to compile E, so we
> can't be sure we'll succeed until we have succeeded.
I appreciate Mark's moderate response to me badly sticking my foot in my
mouth. It's true that I'm assuming a lot, not least due to gnu.expr's coming
from a Scheme implementation, and since E is so heavily lambda calculus
inspired, I did indeed allow myself to get carried away by an assumed
Please reply to <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> using PGP. My public key can
be found at <http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371>. PGP can be found at
<http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html>. Beginning 11/1/1999, unenciphered
e-mail will be immediately deleted unread. Thank you.