[E-Lang] Irreversible delegation, was: draft statement of consensus
Fri, 9 Feb 2001 10:42:54 -0700
Interesting, Ralph. You have detected a required linkage between 2 of the
separate statements, making my proposed policy of being able to delete
individual items incorrect. I shall have to think about how to deal with
this in the future more successfully.
In the meantime, since Alan and Hal have both agreed to leave #2 intact, I
will proceed and publish the whole statement formally later today.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ralph Hartley <email@example.com>
To: Marc Stiegler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Karp, Alan <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>; <email@example.com>;
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: [E-Lang] Irreversible delegation, was: draft statement of
> Marc Stiegler wrote:
> > Since this discussion seems to be taking multiple turns, I will, unless
> > miracle occurs, invoke the procedure I spelled out several days ago, and
> > remove item 2 from the Statement of Consensus which I will be formally
> > publishing tomorrow. Any resolution on this discussion can be included
> > future Statement.
> > Uh, the definition of a "miracle" would, I think, be that Alan and Hal
> > send me email saying to include item 2 without change. This assumes no
> > else jumps into the fray or requests that I remove item 2, in which case
> > item 2 remains toast :-)
> Without the caveat of item 2, I don't think I can agree to item 3 as
> The phrase
> "architecturally sound" could be then be construed to include "complete".
> Ralph Hartley
> e-lang mailing list