[E-Lang] Syntax change: reducing side-effects
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:13:11 -0800
At 11:24 PM -0500 2/12/01, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:38:47 -0800
> From: Dean Tribble <email@example.com>
> We should change the syntax (in as painless a way as possible) so it is
> statically apparent at name definition time whether a variable could be
>I agree. Scheme got this wrong.
>e-lang mailing list
I agree with the change. My (ugly) transclusion code at
<http://cap-lore.com/code/TF/> was written with as many "const"
tokens as possible. And still I missed a few. Declarations without
const, are very few. "const" is abbreviated as "C" via the standard
Norman Hardy <http://cap-lore.com/>