[E-Lang] get, set, and dot
Marc Stiegler
marcs@skyhunter.com
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:46:39 -0700
How deliciously petulant :-)
In fact, I don't think any of us were ever proposing a syntax in which these
syntaxes did anything except assign the maker object to the new variable :-)
--marcs
> > MarcS wrote:
> > > def myThing := thingMaker
> > > #versus
> > > def myThing := newThing
> >
> > If, as I suggest, E also got rid of the "optional ()" sugar, then this
> > problem would go away. It would then be obvious that neither of these
> > expressions could possibly be calling a method.
>
>
> You mean those statements above could be _invoking_ the methods
> `thingMaker' and `newThing', respectively!? Ack!
>
>
> They look very much to me like simply assigning the name `myThing' to
> refer to the same thing (function) that `thingMaker' refers to.
>
> Regards,
>
> Petulant Python Programmer