[E-Lang] Name mangling

[Mark S. Miller]

At 08:26 AM Wednesday 5/23/01, Ravi Pandya wrote:
>Something like opAdd is readable enough that I could probably live with it
>as the single Java interface.

opAdd seems like a reasonable compromise.  If there are no objections, I'll 
do it this way.


>Another idea for handling existing classes: wrappers for specific classes
>and interfaces that map the E conventions to whatever that class supports, [...]

What advantages would this have over the existing class-sugaring mechanism?  
(See the last section of 
http://www.erights.org/javadoc/overview-summary.html ).


        Cheers,
        --MarkM