[E-Lang] Re: Distress (was: the return of `return')

Mark S. Miller markm@caplet.com
Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:18:57 -0700


At 02:00 PM Wednesday 6/20/01, Bill Frantz wrote:
>>I didn't understand this sentence.
>
>In the case of a block that looks like:
>
>{
>  ...
>  if (foo) {
>     ...
>     bar
>  }
>}
>
>If foo is true, then the return value will be bar.  If foo is not true,
>then the return value will be EMPTY, the only value of type VOID.

Gotcha.  Same as E, but their "EMPTY" is our "null", and their "VOID" is our 
"Void".


        Cheers,
        --MarkM