[E-Lang] To Be Or Not To Be (was: down with 'define')
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:08:04 -0700
> Maybe I'd feel different if I saw another explanation presented in terms
> you use it rather than in terms of what it expands to in Kernel-E (in
> find that explanations of the meaning of E constructs in terms of Kernel-E
> produce much more shadow than light).
Chip, did my recent message about using it for Makers help you understand
why this is both interesting and perhaps even sensible?