[E-Lang] Authority -- what is its dual?
Norman Hardy
norm@cap-lore.com
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 17:24:12 -0700
At 15:15 +0100 01/10/17, Mark Seaborn wrote:
>As I understand it, authority is defined as the ability to influence
>the world. Sensory capabilities are then regarded as not conveying
>authority. Information in general is also regarded as not conveying
>authority.
I have viewed the ability to sense as a kind of authority, but perhaps
in practice "authority" usually refers to the stronger sorts of abilities.
A term for for 'the ability to effect' would be useful.
>(This seems to assume a strong capability system, and ignore synergy
>effects, so that if a chunk of information or a sensory capability is
>used with another capability to unlock some new authority, this
>authority is regarded as being conveyed by this latter capability and
>not by the information or sensory capability. I'm happy with this
>view, though I'd like to check whether others share it.)
I come to the same conclusion arguing from the transformation
that defines synergy away.
{<http://cap-lore.com/CapTheory/Synergy.html#safe>
>A consequence is that a capability to find out the current time
>doesn't carry authority (so `authority to read the clock' is
>oxymoronic). But it is good design to deny programs access to sources
>of non-determinism when they don't need them. Similarly, in general
>we don't want to give a program access to libraries it doesn't need,
>because those libraries might influence its behaviour, leading to
>changes in behaviour that are hard to pin down when we change those
>libraries.
We considered libraries in Keykos to be immutable; new editions were viewed
as new objects, with keys thereto in a conventional permanent slot perhaps.
My note on insulating environments at <http://cap-lore.com/CapTheory/term.html>
orthogonally disects environments twice, into four kinds:
limiting inflow vs. limiting outflow of information,
enforced by internal logic vs. imposed by an external force.
some of your distinctions appear there.
The terms I propose there have no currency.
--
Norman Hardy <http://cap-lore.com/>